by Glenn Kissack
September 2, 2022
Not only do tens of millions of people around the world hate capitalism and want to see it replaced with a society run by and for workers, but they have felt that way for many generations. 125 years ago, Edward Bellamy wrote the novel Looking Backward, a powerful and intelligent critique of capitalism, a system that Bellamy considered cruel and wasteful. It was written at a time of great inequality and great workers’ struggles and also soon after Karl Marx had published his searing analysis of capitalism in the Communist Manifesto. Marx also raised ideas about how a post-capitalist communist society would work, most profoundly from each worker according to ability and to each according to need. Looking Backward is Bellamy’s vivid description of the egalitarian society that he saw replacing capitalism.
The book begins with the main character, Julian West, who suffers from insomnia, going to sleep under hypnosis in 1887 in Boston in a fortified chamber. A fire destroys his home but not the chamber, and Julian awakes in the year 2000 and discovers that life as he knew it has changed dramatically.
Capitalism’s individual struggle for the means of life (food, clothing, housing) under capitalism has been replaced with a cooperative system that provides everyone — men, women, children — with an equal share of society’s surplus, in the form of a credit card. There is no money. Bellamy envisioned a new society in which the private ownership of the means of production and distribution has been replaced by public ownership.
Every person capable of working is required to do so, but only from the ages of 21 to 45. Upon retirement at 45, people are free to pursue hobbies, further education or travel. Young people are well-educated and encouraged and assisted to find jobs they are most interested in and capable of doing. Harder jobs have shorter hours in society’s “industrial army”.
Every neighborhood in Boston — and every other city and town — has high-quality dining halls, libraries, recreational facilities, theaters, and clothing distribution centers where people can select what they want using catalogs and paying with their credit cards. There is no more poverty and crime has been greatly reduced. The new society has more wealth because it’s eliminated the waste, lack of planning, competition (including needless advertising), and the cost of an extensive state apparatus (including the police and an army that had been used to protect the property of the wealthy, suppress working-class rebellions and deal with crime caused by poverty).
Bellamy’s new society is more than socialism. Money has been eliminated and since everyone — those working and those not working; husbands, wives, children — receives a credit card with the same amount, people receive according to the communist principle of “to each according to his needs” rather than the socialist principle of “to each according to his work”.
Looking Backward was a best-selling novel in the late 19th century, third in popularity after Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Ben-Hur. Bellamy clubs sprang up around the country to discuss how to organize to win the change depicted in the book. And Bellamy wrote a sequel, Equality, to describe the new communist-type society in greater detail.
Looking Backward is very persuasive in its insistence that that the new communist-type system is superior to the old dog-eat-dog world of capitalism. Yet the novel does have its imperfections:
•. Bellamy was averse to class struggle. In the novel the new society comes about in the early 20th century when enough people were horrified by the chaos, poverty, violence and misery of capitalism and decided collectively to replace it. A revolution had not been necessary, only the widespread realization that the big corporations needed to be nationalized, money eliminated and each person provided with an equal share of society’s bounty. Bellamy was a believer in gradualism and evolutionary socialism, which the ruling class will never accept — either in 1887 or today.
- The mills in New England, where the novel is situated, were populated largely by immigrant workers, yet immigrants and black people are virtually invisible in the book, and there’s no a mention of racism.
• There’s no indication that the new society changed the nature of work. The “industrial army” seems to function the same way it would under capitalism, except that salaries are the same, a doctor and a factory worker receiving the same pay, although the latter is likely to be less satisfied with his or her work.
• The novel does show how the new society improves the lot of women, many dependent on their husbands for money. But it does so in an off-putting Victorian manner, with women (through Edith, one of the main characters) portrayed as feminine, by which is meant delicate.
• Bellamy’s egalitarian society, while impressive in many ways, is portrayed as finished, with no suggestion that struggle would be necessary to maintain its egalitarian nature and prevent the rise of a new ruling class. In the novel, on top of the new society sits a paternal central government that competently plans and controls production and distribution. There’s no revolutionary party and no more political struggle, because society is now portrayed as perfect. But every new society is subject to tensions between those leaders who want more privileges and benefits for themselves and their friends, and those who want to maintain its egalitarian features.
Despite these reservations, Looking Backward is a beautifully written, powerful plea for a new world, a communist world.
Glenn Kissack retired from teaching mathematics at Hunter College High School in NYC. He’s an active retiree in the Professional Staff Congress, the union that represents faculty and professional staff at the City University of NY.
3 thoughts on “Looking Back at Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy”
I believe there is a difference between equality of resources (credit cards with equal amounts) and the principle “to each according to need.” People’s needs are different, and some may need more resources than others. (According to an old joke mathematicians need only a pencil, a piece of paper and a wastebasket while philosophers don’t even need the wastebasket.) A particle physicist will need more than an historian. In terms of personal consumption, people still have greater and lesser needs because they are different. The greatest human fulfillment come from contributing what we can to a collective; the ideal of equality assumes a capitalist mentality of measuring and comparing who has more and less.
The concepts of Looking Back from 1890 sounds like it can mesh well with the World Economic Forum Great Reset economic reform strategies for 2030. With UBI (universal basic income) in your credit card, you will own nothing and be happy.
Ian, as you know, the World Economic Forum is a group of few thousand very rich businessmen and politicians who work with them. They advocate for business deregulation and other pro-business policies. That’s the opposite of what Edward Bellamy envisioned in Looking Backward (1887). If he was alive today, he would be appalled at the level of homelessness and poverty, as well as forever wars and climate catastrophe. There are billions of people in the world today who own little or nothing and of course they are not happy.